The ratio rho(t) = T(p)/T(s) of the complex amplitude transmission coefficients for the p and s polarizations of a transparent unbacked or embedded thin film is examined as a function of the film thickness-to-wavelength ratio d/lambda and the angle of incidence Phi for a given film refractive index N. The maximum value of the differential transmission phase shift (or retardance), Delta(t) = argrho(t), is determined, for given N and Phi, by a simple geometrical construction that involves the iso-Phi circle locus of rho(t) in the complex plane. The upper bound on this maximum equals arctan{[N - (1/N)]/2} and is attained in the limit of grazing incidence. An analytical noniterative method is developed for determining N and d of the film from rho(t) measured by transmission ellipsometry (TELL) at Phi = 45 degrees . An explicit expression for d Delta(t) of an ultrathin film, d/lambda << 1, is derived in product form that shows the dependence of Delta(t) on N, Phi, and d/lambda separately. The angular dependence is given by an obliquity factor, f(0)(Phi) = 2((1/2)) sinPhi tanPhi, which is verified experimentally by TELL measurements on a stable planar soap film in air at lambda = 633 nm. The singularity of f(0) at Phi = 90 degrees is resolved; Delta(t) is shown to have a aximum just short of grazing incidence and drops to 0 at Phi = 90 degrees . Because N and d/lambda are inseparable for an ultrathin film, N is determined by a Brewster angle measurement and d/lambdais subsequently obtained from Delta(t) Finally, the ellipsometric function in reflection rho(r) is related to that in transmission P(t).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. M. A. Azzam (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: