Why the study?
The fundamental rationale underlying decreased diastolic-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) in coronary stenoses under physiological resting conditions was not elucidated.
What is the mechanistic rationale underlying the decreased diastolic-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) in coronary stenoses?
What is the mechanistic rationale underlying the decreased diastolic-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) in coronary stenoses?
DSVR decreases distal to coronary stenoses due to a higher influence of increased stenosis resistance on total vascular resistance during diastole compared to systole, and can be reliably measured non-invasively.
Supports DSVR as resting LAD stenosis index; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objective: Diastolic-systolic velocity ratio (DSVR) is a resting index to assess stenoses in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). DSVR can be measured by echocardiographic or intracoronary Doppler flow velocity. The objective of this cohort study was to elucidate the fundamental rationale underlying the decreased DSVR in coronary stenoses. Methods: In cohort 1, simultaneous measurements of intracoronary Doppler flow velocity and pressure were acquired in the LAD of 228 stable patients. Phasic stenosis resistance, microvascular resistance and total vascular resistance (defined as stenosis and microvascular resistance combined) were studied during physiological resting conditions. Stenoses were classified according to severity by strata of 0.10 fractional flow reserve (FFR) units. Results: DSVR was decreased in stenoses with lower FFR. Stenosis resistance was equal in systole and diastole for every FFR stratum. Microvascular resistance was consistently higher during systole than diastole. In lower FFR strata, stenosis resistance as a percentage of the total vascular resistance increases both during systole and diastole. The difference between the stenosis resistance as a percentage of total vascular resistance during systole and diastole increases for lower FFR strata, with an accompanying rise in diastolic-systolic resistance ratio. A significant inverse correlation was observed between DSVR and the diastolic-systolic resistance ratio (r=0.91, p<0.001). In cohort 2 (n=23), DSVR was measured both invasively and non-invasively by transthoracic echocardiography, yielding a good correlation (r=0.82, p<0.001). Conclusions: The rationale by which DSVR is decreased distal to coronary stenoses is dependent on a comparatively higher influence of the increased stenosis resistance on total vascular resistance during diastole than systole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waard et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: