Key result
Remote myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography was associated with lower peak diastolic velocity coronary flow reserve in the non-ischemic LAD (1.77 vs 2.4, p=0.00008).
Why the study?
Does remote myocardial ischemia reduce coronary flow reserve in the non-ischemia related left anterior descending coronary artery during dobutamine stress echocardiography?
Observational (n=69)
No
Does remote myocardial ischemia reduce coronary flow reserve in the non-ischemia related left anterior descending coronary artery during dobutamine stress echocardiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.77% vs 2.4%
p-value: p=0.00008
Coronary flow reserve in the non-ischemic LAD is reduced in patients with remote myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography, suggesting early microvascular or atherosclerotic involvement.
May signal diffuse microvascular dysfunction on stress echo; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Incorporation of analysis of coronary velocities in stress studies adds diagnostic value to both clinical variables and dobutamine echocardiography. Micorcirculatory abnormalities may precede obstructive corornary disease. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess Doppler derived coronary velocity and flow of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients without LAD-related ischemia. Methods: Sixty nine patients with chest pain underwent DSE studies to evaluate myocardial ischemia. All had trans-thoracic Doppler interrogation of the distal LAD before and just after termination of the DSE. Coronary velocity reserves (CFR) were calculated as the ratios of post-DSE/baseline diastolic velocities. Volumetric flow in the distal LAD was calculated from the diameter of LAD color jet and velocity integral. Volumetric flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of post-DSE baseline LAD flows. Results: At rest all subjects had left ventricular wall motion score index (WMSI) = 1, while in 28, wall motion abnormality appeared in non-LAD territory with WMSI = 1.17 ± 0.08. Peak diastolic velocity after DSE increased form 28.5 ± 13.6 to 52.4 ± 23.7 cm/sec, P = 9.5 × 10 -11 , and velocity-CFR was 2.08 ± 0.7. Diastolic LAD flow increased from 36.5 ± 23.8 to 75.75 ± 48.7 mL/min, P = 1.21 × 10 -7 and volumetric-CFR was 2.6 ± 2.8. Peak diastolic velocity-CFR in patients without LV wall motion abnormality was 2.4 ± 0.7 while in those with motion abnormality 1.77± 0.56, P = 0.00008. Flow-derived LAD-CFR was 3.3 ± 3.7 in those without compared to 1.88 ± 0.57 in patients with wall motion abnormality, P < 0.05. Conclusion: LAD velocity and flow reserves are reduced in patients with remote myocardial ischemia, which may indicate early atherosclerotic involvement. Â Â Cardiol Res. 2011;2(4):174-180 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/cr57w
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dawod Sharif (2011) conducted an observational in Chest pain evaluated for coronary artery disease (n=69). Remote myocardial ischemia (wall motion abnormality) vs. No remote myocardial ischemia was evaluated on Peak diastolic velocity coronary flow reserve (CFR) (p=0.00008). Remote myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography was associated with lower peak diastolic velocity coronary flow reserve in the non-ischemic LAD (1.77 vs 2.4, p=0.00008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: