Why the study?
Does the integrated maximum current density (IMCD) approach improve the noninvasive detection of myocardial infarction compared to the integrated equivalent current dipole (IECD) approach in healthy subjects and STEMI patients?
Does the integrated maximum current density (IMCD) approach improve the noninvasive detection of myocardial infarction compared to the integrated equivalent current dipole (IECD) approach in healthy subjects and STEMI patients?
The integrated maximum current density approach using magnetocardiography provides high sensitivity and specificity for the noninvasive detection of myocardial infarction.
IMCD may aid noninvasive MI detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We present a new approach of integrated maximum current density (IMCD) for the noninvasive detection of myocardial infarction (MI) using magnetocardiography (MCG) data acquired from a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) system. In this paper, we investigated the relationship of the maximum current density (MCD) in the current density map and the underlying equivalent current dipole (ECD) based on a novel method of reconstructing the ECD in the extremum circle of the magnetic field map. The performance of IMCD and the integrated ECD (IECD) approaches were also evaluated by using 61-channel MCG data from 39 healthy subjects and 102 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Statistical analysis of the healthy and STEMI groups demonstrate that the IMCD approach obtains sensitivity and specificity up to 91.2% and 84.6%, somewhat higher than that of IECD, respectively. The results indicate that IMCD provides spatiotemporal information regarding cardiac electrical activity during ventricular repolarization. This approach may be helpful to diagnose MI in clinic application. The physical concept of the approach is also explained in this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: