Why the study?
The applicability of common noninvasive tests for screening NAFLD is unclear for the detection of MAFLD under newly proposed criteria.
Are traditional NAFLD-related steatosis indices effective for diagnosing MAFLD?
Are traditional NAFLD-related steatosis indices effective for diagnosing MAFLD?
Traditional NAFLD-related steatosis indices, particularly the fatty liver index (FLI), are effective for screening MAFLD and perform comparably or better than for NAFLD.
FLI and related indices may support MAFLD screening similarly to NAFLD; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a new term of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), with newly proposed diagnostic criteria. The applicability of common noninvasive testing for screening NAFLD is unclear for the detection of MAFLD and requires reevaluation. We aimed to validate the effectiveness of traditional NAFLD-related steatosis indices for diagnosing MAFLD and to determine the optimal cutoff values as well as compare their accuracy between NAFLD and MAFLD diagnosis. METHODS: This study enrolled 1866 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database (2017-2018). The diagnostic performances of fatty liver index (FLI), Framingham Steatosis Index (FSI), Zhejiang University index (ZJU), lipid accumulation product (LAP), hepatitis steatosis index (HSI) and visceral adiposity index (VAI) were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve and the optimal cutoff points were calculated according to maximum Youden's index. RESULTS: FLI had the highest AUROC (0.840) for predicting MAFLD in the whole population, with a cutoff value of 56.93. The AUROCs of FLI, FSI, ZJU, LAP, HSI and VAI for predicting MAFLD/NAFLD were 0.840/0.812, 0.833/0.811, 0.826/0.811, 0.826/0.799, 0.814/0.803 and 0.747/0.729, respectively. The AUROC values of all indices decreased in the subgroup of the population with overweight or diabetes. CONCLUSION: The NAFLD-related scores would be equally useful to screen MAFLD and seemed to be more compatible with MAFLD. The FLI was optimal in both MAFLD and NAFLD diagnoses. However, a new predictive indicator suitable for various characteristics of the population is worth further development in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: