Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unsteady cavitating turbulent flow around a NACA66 hydrofoil was simulated using a mass transfer cavitation model and a modified filter-based turbulence model in this paper. The modified filter-based turbulence model can accurately predict the pressure coefficient in midplane and shedding frequency of the unsteady cloud cavitation than standard [Formula: see text]–[Formula: see text] model and filter-based turbulence model. The time evolution of transient cavitation cloud structure predicted by the three-turbulence model was compared. The result which was predicted by the modified filter-based turbulence model is in good agreement with the experimental results. The time evolution of re-entrant jet had been analyzed. The instantaneous wall-pressure evolution on the suction surface (SS) predicted by the modified filter-based turbulence model had been analyzed. The cavitation-vortex interaction had been analyzed in this study. The different effects on the cavitation-vortex interaction of the vortex stretching term, vortex dilatation term and baroclinic torque term in the transport equation of vorticity had been discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: