Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To define better the safety profile of micafungin, an analysis of micafungin clinical trial safety data was undertaken. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adverse event data were pooled worldwide from 17 clinical efficacy and safety studies. Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 5.0. RESULTS: In the pooled clinical trial data set, 3028 patients received at least one dose of micafungin. The mean age of patients was 41.4 years; with 296 (9.8%) children (< 16 years) and 387 (12.8%) elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Common underlying conditions were hematopoietic stem cell and other transplantations (26.1%), malignancies (20.8%) and HIV (32.9%). Mean exposure was 18 days for adults and 29 days for children. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (2.8%), vomiting (2.5%), phlebitis (2.5%), hypokalemia (2.1%), fever/pyrexia (2.1%) and diarrhea (2%), as well as increases in alkaline phosphatase (2.7%), aspartate aminotransferase (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase (2%). Although elderly adults had a higher incidence of renal impairment (1%) compared with non-elderly adult (0.1%) and pediatric patients (0.3%), there were no clear trends showing an association between higher doses of micafungin or longer treatment durations and increased incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of a large database demonstrated a favorable clinical safety profile for micafungin similar to other echinocandins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cornely et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: