BackgroundAir-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway is an extraglottic airway device used as a primary airway tool or as an adjunct to tracheal intubation. The bougie is a simple flexible device that might increase the success rate of endotracheal intubation either blindly or through a supraglottic device. We hypothesized that using bougie guided intubation through air-Q™ can improve the success rate with minimal complications.MethodsOne hundred and forty patients of either sex, >18 years old, ASA I-II scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to one of two groups of 70 patients each. Blind tracheal intubation was performed through air-Q™ with bougie assistance (Group B) or without (Group Q). In both groups, 3 attempts were allowed for successful device insertion. After obtaining normal capnographic wave, 3 more attempts were tried for intubation with or without bougie guidance. Lung ventilation through air-Q™ was permitted between intubation attempts. If tracheal intubation through air-Q™ was unsuccessful, it was performed by direct laryngoscopy.ResultsAir-Q™ time, ease, attempts number of insertion and ventilation grade were comparable between both groups. Total intubation time was significantly longer in group-B (P = 0.001) while overall success rate for intubation was comparable (64.3%). Group-B showed significant (P = 0.001) higher incidence of complications (trauma (P = 0.023), sore throat (P = 0.001), dysphonia (P = 0.023) and dysphagia (P = 0.001)) as compared with group-Q. In spite of significant decrease in both heart rate and mean arterial pressure in both groups after air-Q™ insertion, yet there was significant increase in both parameters after intubation compared to baseline values (P < 0.05) which was more prominent in group-B than in group-Q. Significant increase in HR and MAP was elicited after bougie placement in group-B (P < 0.01).ConclusionBougie guided tracheal intubation through air-Q™ didn’t improve overall success rate with significant longer time, hemodynamic derangement and traumatic sequelae.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebied et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: