Why the study?
There is an increasing prevalence of emotional disorders such as anxiety and depression causing great suffering and socioeconomic costs, while auricular vagus nerve stimulation represents an innovative neuromodulation technique based on the biological role of the vagus nerve in emotional processing.
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve emotional state in individuals with emotional disturbances?
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve emotional state in individuals with emotional disturbances?
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation represents a promising, biologically-based neuromodulation approach for the treatment of emotional disorders like anxiety and depression.
Hypothesis-generating for emotional anatomy in affective disorders; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Emotional experiences are a part of our lives. The maladaptive functioning of an individual's emotional field can lead to emotional disturbances of various kinds, such as anxiety and depression. Currently, there is an increasing prevalence of emotional disorders that cause great human suffering and high socioeconomic costs. Emotional processing has a biological basis. The major neuroscientific theories of emotion are based on biological functioning, and all of them take into account the anatomy and function of the tenth cranial nerve: the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve connects the subdiaphragmatic and supradiaphragmatic areas and modulates emotional processing as the basis of interoceptive functioning. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation is a new and innovative neuromodulation technique based on the function of the vagus nerve. Several interventions have shown that this new neurostimulation technique is a very promising resource for treating emotional disorders. In this paper, we summarise three neuroscientific theories of emotion, explain what transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation is, and present arguments for its use and continued research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ainara Aranberri Ruiz (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: