Why the study?
Analgesic adequacy during labor without adverse effects is vital, as painful labor can negatively impact maternal and fetal physiology.
Does 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl provide better epidural labour analgesia compared to 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl in parturients?
Does 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl provide better epidural labour analgesia compared to 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl in parturients?
0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl provides comparable epidural labour analgesia to 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl, with a potential trend towards more spontaneous deliveries.
Ropivacaine-fentanyl epidural yields comparable analgesia with less motor block than bupivacaine-fentanyl; reinforces its preference for ambulatory labor analgesia.
Background: Analgesic adequacy during labor along with the avoidance of adverse effects is vital for obstetric conditions. Painful labor can have negative impacts on maternal and fetal physiology. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine with fentanyl and bupivacaine with fentanyl in epidural labour analgesia. Methodology: Seventy ASA I&II parturients with singleton pregnancies who presented in active labour with cervical dilatation of 3-5cm were studied in a prospective, randomized control manner. Patients were randomized into Group A (ropivacaine)-35 patients and Group B (bupivacaine) - 35 patients. Epidural analgesia was performed and various parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, pain score) and complications if any were recorded every 15 minutes in the 1st hour, every 30 minutes in the 2nd hour and every hour later on. Results: The fluctuations in pain were not clinically or statistically significant between the two study groups. The number of patients who required bolus were 7(20%) in both the groups. The spontaneous deliveries were more, 62.9% in Group-A as compared to 54.3% in Group-B. The instrumental delivery rates were less, 25.7% in Group-A as compared to 37.1% in Group-B.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manjula et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: