Why the study?
Does continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine reduce fetal distress and death compared to paracervical block in pregnant women during labor?
Does continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine reduce fetal distress and death compared to paracervical block in pregnant women during labor?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous lumbar epidural block with bupivacaine is a safer alternative to paracervical block for labor and delivery, avoiding severe fetal toxicity.
Because of the minimal effects on mother and fetus, regional anesthetic technics are widely employed for labor and delivery. However, the literature describes at least 35 fetal and neonatal deaths and a frightening incidence of fetal distress associated with paracervical block for 1st-stage labor. Continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia for 1st-stage labor has also been associated with fetal distress, but this is minimal and no deaths have been reported. Bupivacaine, a relatively new, long-lasting local anesthetic, is extemely toxic when administered paracervically, but no deaths have been reported with its use for epidural anesthesia. While choice of method and agent must be individualized, continuous lumbar epidural block with bupivacaine appears as effective as and less often dangerous to the fetus than paracervical block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SALTS et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: