Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine the impact of complications and interventions during neurocritical care on outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Do neurocritical care complications and interventions influence clinical outcome and death in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Do neurocritical care complications and interventions influence clinical outcome and death in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Decompressive craniectomy, sepsis, and hydrocephalus are significant predictors of poor outcome and death at one year in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND: This observational study was performed to show the impact of complications and interventions during neurocritical care on the outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We analyzed 203 cases treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms, which were classified regarding clinical outcome after one year according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We reviewed the data with reference to the occurrence of typical complications and interventions in neurocritical care units. RESULTS: Decompressive craniectomy (odds ratio 21.77 / 6.17 ; p < 0.0001 / p = 0.013), sepsis (odds ratio 14.67 / 6.08 ; p = 0.037 / 0.033) and hydrocephalus (odds ratio 3.71 / 6.46 ; p = 0.010 / 0.00095) were significant predictors for poor outcome and death after one year beside "World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies" (WFNS) grade (odds ratio 3.86 / 4.67 ; p < 0.0001 / p < 0.0001) and age (odds ratio 1.06 / 1.10 ; p = 0.0030 / p < 0.0001) in our multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression model). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, decompressive craniectomy, sepsis and hydrocephalus significantly influence the outcome and occurrence of death after aneurysmal SAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammer et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: