Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The influence of hydrostatic pressure ( P ) up to 200 bar of gaseous He was investigated on holes burned over the inhomogeneous S 1 ← S 0 absorption bands of polycyclic hydrocarbons, a polymethine dye, and tetrapyrrolic compounds imbedded in polymer matrices. The pressure shift coefficients dν/d P show a linear dependence on hole burning frequency (ν) that can be extrapolated to the frequency ν 0( P ) where no pressure shift occurs. The ν 0( P ) values deviate significantly from the actual 0−0 origins of the nonsolvated chromophores. The dependence of dν/d P on ν can be considerably steeper than the 2-fold isothermal compressibility of the matrix 2β T, expected for the distance dependence of intermolecular potential r - 6 (e.g. London forces). Other solvent shift mechanisms, such as linear and quadratic Stark effects in the matrix cavity field, yield lower slope values than 2β T ( 1 / 3 β T and 2 / 3 β T, respectively). Tentatively, these controversies are rationalized in terms of intermolecular repulsive interactions that have a much steeper distance dependence ( r - 12 ) than the electrostatic or dispersive forces. The solvent shifts of band maxima, the inhomogeneous bandwidths, and the pressure shifts of spectral holes are discussed in terms of intermolecular interaction mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Indrek Renge (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: