Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To compare the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of lymphoblastoid interferon (IFN-alphaN1) and recombinant interferon alfa 2a (IFN-alpha2a) in patients with chronic hepatitis caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV), 234 consecutive patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis were randomized prospectively to receive titrated doses (starting dose = 6 million units [MU]) of IFN-alpha2a (n = 118) or IFN-alphaN1 (n = 116) for 12 months. HCV RNA was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantified by branched-DNA (bDNA) assay, and genotyped by reverse hybridization assay. Thirty-one patients in the IFN-alpha2a group and 28 in the IFN-alphaN1 group (total, 59 [25%] had normal transaminases and undetectable HCV RNA by RT-PCR after 12 months of therapy, but only 19 in the first group and 20 in the second group (total, 39 [17%]) had biochemical and virological responses 12 months after treatment was discontinued. The two treatment groups differed in terms of prevalence of major drug-related adverse reactions (23% vs. 37%, P = .025). The mean total dose per patient was similar for the two groups, i.e., 502 MU IFN-alpha2a vs. 496 MU IFN-alphaN1, and the cost of each sustained response was $31,800 and $32,440, respectively. By multivariate analysis, pretreatment viremia higher than 0.2 MEq/mL and infection with genotype 1 were independently associated to treatment failure. The outcome of treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients was not improved by the administration of high cumulative doses of lymphoblastoid IFN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rumi et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: