Why the study?
Does an intermuscular technique for S-ICD implantation provide reliable defibrillation efficacy and low complication rates in patients requiring an S-ICD?
Does an intermuscular technique for S-ICD implantation provide reliable defibrillation efficacy and low complication rates in patients requiring an S-ICD?
An intermuscular technique for S-ICD implantation is feasible, provides excellent cosmetic results, and demonstrates reliable defibrillation efficacy with low long-term complication rates.
May improve S-ICD sensing via optimized positioning; extends technique descriptions but leaves open outcome validation in trials.
AIMS: The subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillator was designed to overcome electrode complications of transvenous defibrillation systems. While largely achieved, pocket complications have increased. Subcutaneous implantation of the pulse generator leaves it prone to erosion, extrusion, discomfort, and poor cosmesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We use a demonstration electrode and pulse generator with fluoroscopy, prior to prepping and draping, to maximize the left ventricular mass between them. We adapted a submuscular abdominal ICD technique to implant the S-ICD intermuscularly between the anterior surface of serratus anterior and the posterior surface of latissimus dorsi. Surgery in our patients beyond the subcutaneous tissue was bloodless, as muscle layers were carefully separated but not incised, which also protected the long thoracic nerve. Two layers of muscle protect the pulse generator. We have implanted 82 consecutive patients with this technique, taking ∼65 min. All patients were converted with 65 J standard polarity shock during induced arrhythmia conversion testing, with six (7.3%) patients requiring a repositioning of the pulse generator prior to successful conversion. Seven spontaneous episodes of ventricular fibrillation were detected in three (3.6%) patients, all successfully converted back to sinus rhythm. Long-term patient outcomes have been good with low complication rates over the mean ± standard deviation 3.6 ± 1.2 years. CONCLUSION: Our intermuscular technique and implant methodology is successful for placement of the subcutaneous defibrillator pulse generator. Our technique leads to an excellent cosmetic result and high levels of patient satisfaction. Rates of first shock conversion during defibrillation testing, inappropriate shocks, and complications during follow-up compare favourably with previous published case series. There were no left arm movement limitations post-operatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winter et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: