Why the study?
Hip fracture requires intensive healthcare resource utilization, but the determinants of continuum-care episode costs, particularly the contribution of different rehabilitation settings, were not well established.
What are the determinants of costs for integrated Continuum-Care Episodes (CCE) for hip fracture, particularly regarding different rehabilitation settings?
What are the determinants of costs for integrated Continuum-Care Episodes (CCE) for hip fracture, particularly regarding different rehabilitation settings?
Intermediate care settings are associated with lower overall costs for integrated continuum-care episodes following hip fracture compared to hospital bed-based rehabilitation.
Intermediate care may lower hip fracture episode costs; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background Hip fracture (HF) requires an intensive healthcare resources utilization. Long-term morbidity related to poor fracture management is associated with a significant increase in healthcare costs. Many factors may affect the costs and outcomes in patients with HF. Using a definition of integrated Continuum-Care Episode (CCE) that encompasses the hospital phase and the post-acute rehabilitation after a surgical procedure for HF, we investigated the costs of CCEs for HF and their determinants, with particular regard to the contribution of different rehabilitation settings. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using data extracted from administrative databases of 5094 consecutive patients hospitalized for HF in 2017, aged ≥65 years, and resident in Emilia Romagna, Italy. To evaluate the overall costs of the CCE, we calculated the acute and post-acute costs from the date of the first hospital admission to the end of the integrated CCE. The determinants of costs were investigated using generalized linear regression models. Results After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, type of surgery (b=-0.340, p<0.001), and hospital bed-based rehabilitation in public or private healthcare facilities either followed by rehabilitation in a community hospital/temporary nursing home beds (b=0.372, p<0.001) or not (b=0.313, p<0.001) were the strongest determinants of costs, while rehabilitation in intermediate care facilities alone was associated with lower costs (0.163, p<0.001). Conclusions Our findings suggest that CCE cost and its variability is mainly related to the rehabilitation settings. Cost-wise, intermediate care resulted to be an appropriate setting for providing post-acute rehabilitation for HF, representing the one associated with the lower cost of the overall CCE. Therefore, intermediate care settings should be privileged when planning HF rehabilitation pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golinelli et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: