Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper we examine the governance of sociotechnical transitions. Prevailing conceptualizations often focus on the execution of state authority though the development of policy-mixes, conflating governance and governing. As the system transition literature expands from a procedural analysis informed by past transitions to one capable of addressing and managing transitions which are broadly perceived as being necessary, we re-conceptualize governance with a focus on stakeholder alignment as being necessary in understanding transition trajectory. We develop a holistic framework of transition governance premised on three windows of governance, transition enablement, transition readiness , and transition embedment , which are additional to procedural frameworks of transition development and facilitate the prioritization of interventions toward ensuring, or accelerating, the development of the desired outcomes within the desired timeframe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gray et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: