Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Specimens submitted for diagnosis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection were inoculated into shell vials and reacted with a commercial DNA probe kit (Pathogene; Enzo Biochem, Inc., New York, N.Y.) and an immunofluorescence assay at 16 h postinoculation. The results were compared with isolation of the virus in conventional tube cell cultures. Of 504 specimens, 105 (20.8%) were positive for HSV. Of the 105, 93 HSV-positive specimens (89%) were detected by all three assay systems. Maximum detection of HSV (100 of 105 [95%]) was obtained by probe or monoclonal antibody assay in shell vials, which had sensitivities of 98 and 97%, respectively, compared with viral recovery in conventional tube cell cultures (mean time for recognition of cytopathic effects, 2 days). Both shell vial assays were 99% specific. The DNA probe kit may be used as an alternative to a monoclonal antibody and fluorescence assay in shell vials as a diagnostic method for rapid laboratory detection of HSV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Espy et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: