Simulation study demonstrates valid uncertainty quantification in graph neural network surrogates, indicating adaptive conformal prediction provides tight error bounds.
Machine learning surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) achieve substantial speedups but lack uncertainty quantification (UQ). We develop a post hoc conformal prediction (CP) framework that wraps any trained graph neural network (GNN) surrogate to produce prediction sets with coverage near-nominal levels. Using MeshGraphNet on two benchmark datasets-CylinderFlow (2D velocity) and Flag (3D position), we compare five prediction-set geometries. Our componentwise adaptive (CW-Adaptive) method emerges as the robust universal choice, achieving 28%-55% smaller prediction sets versus ℓ2 balls across both datasets at 95% confidence while maintaining near-nominal coverage. By learning per-component scales from domain-aware features, CW-Adaptive captures both spatial heterogeneity and anisotropic error structure-outperforming Mahalanobis ellipsoids that provide only modest gains (approx. 14%) when residuals are anisotropic and inflate sets otherwise. All methods achieve coverage within 2%-3% of nominal despite distribution drift in mesh-based simulations that violates exchangeability assumption. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advancing uncertainty quantification in AI systems'.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mabtoul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: