Validation study reveals accurate hail size and flux measurements via automated optical imaging and deep learning, indicating strong potential for radar and weather model validation.
Ground-based hail observations with high temporal resolution and precise microphysical quantification remain critically scarce, limiting the validation of radar-based hail detection algorithms and convective-scale numerical models. Existing automatic hail sensors often suffer from small sampling areas, susceptibility to rain interference, and limited automation in post-event processing. We present HailCam, an intelligent hail observation instrument integrating high-definition optical imaging, automated particle collection, and real-time deep learning inference to address critical gaps in time-resolved ground-based hail microphysics measurements. The system employs a ConvNeXt-Tiny architecture with Mask R-CNN for instance segmentation, capturing hailstone number, size distribution, and number flux at one-minute intervals over a 60 × 60 cm sampling area. Laboratory validation using synthetic ice spheres (5–45 mm) and polystyrene foam spheres demonstrates 91 % sizing accuracy within ± 5 % relative error (RMSE 0.21–1.71 mm) and counting linearity of R2= 0.9989. Field intercomparison with an OTT Parsivel2 disdrometer during a nocturnal hail event on 9 May 2025 reveals consistent temporal evolution of hailfall and statistically indistinguishable size distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D = 0.167–0.250, p> 0.84), though absolute counts differ due to distinct phase-discrimination methodologies. HailCam provides co-located, time-stamped measurements essential for validating radar-based hail algorithms and constraining convective-scale numerical models, particularly in complex terrain where remote sensing is challenged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: