Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates that larger visual cue amplitudes enhance motor imagery vividness, cortical activation, and decoding accuracy, suggesting optimized protocols for neurorehabilitation.
Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) is an important research topic in the field of motor function rehabilitation. Although dynamic visual cues can modulate motor imagery (MI) performance, the role of movement amplitude remains underexplored. This study investigated the effects of movement amplitude in dynamic visual cues on MI ability and MI-BCI classification performance. Participants performed right-hand MI tasks cued by dynamic visual stimuli with three amplitudes: large (60°), medium (40°), and small (20°). Subjective kinesthetic imagery vividness, beta-band Event-related desynchronization (ERD), and classification accuracy were measured. Large-amplitude visual cues significantly enhanced KMI vividness scores (3.14 ± 0.85), elicited stronger MI-related cortical activation (beta-band ERD: −6.92 ± 9.97), and achieved higher MI-BCI classification accuracy (e.g., beta-band accuracy: 93.45% ± 5.37%) compared with medium and small amplitudes. These findings suggest that dynamic visual cue amplitude is associated with improved MI performance and provide practical guidance for optimizing MI-BCI training and rehabilitation-oriented HCI design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: