Hydrological modeling reveals land-surface restoration decouples local runoff generation from downstream export in an alpine coal mine, highlighting the role of drainage connectivity.
Open-pit coal mining can alter surface morphology, drainage connectivity, and runoff redistribution in alpine fragile basins, but whether ecological restoration restores basin-scale runoff or reorganizes subbasin responses remains unclear. This study used the Juhugeng District of the Muli coalfield on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau as a case study and developed a controlled SWAT scenario framework using multi-temporal DEMs and land-use datasets for pre-mining (2006), post-mining (2014), and post-restoration (2024) land-surface conditions. All scenarios were driven by identical 2024 meteorological forcing to isolate land-surface effects. Basin-averaged runoff coefficient and runoff depth changed only slightly: mining increased them by 0.29% and 0.30%, whereas restoration reduced them by 1.01% and 1.56%. Runoff volume declined by 0.41% after mining and 2.93% after restoration, mainly due to changes in DEM-derived contributing area and drainage connectivity. Subbasin responses were more heterogeneous, and their spatial correspondence with pit lakes and engineered drainage structures suggests a decoupling between local runoff generation and downstream export. These controlled-scenario results emphasize the importance of runoff redistribution and drainage connectivity in mine restoration assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: