Machine learning study demonstrates dynamic early dropout prediction in online learners, indicating that temporal feature attribution enables timely targeted student support.
Online learning faces persistently high dropout rates, yet most prediction models are static, single-time-point classifiers with little interpretability and untested cross-course transfer. Drawing on 32,593 registrations from the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD), we build a temporally dynamic, interpretable machine learning framework. Its three-layer architecture spans static entry attributes, dynamic behavioral indicators and trend measures, each mapped to a construct from self-regulated learning, Community of Inquiry or integration theory. Six algorithms are benchmarked across five cumulative observation windows. LightGBM is best or joint-best at every window, reaching AUC 0.727 before the course opens and 0.911 by day 120. Temporal SHAP analysis identifies the engagement persistence ratio as the leading predictor from mid-course onward. A collapse of activity in the second half of the window raises risk, whereas sustained activity lowers it. The six trend features alone carry 25.4% of the total attribution. Leave-One-Course-Out cross-validation returns 0.857, and a prospective analysis restricted to learners still enrolled returns 0.72 to 0.75, the figure an institution should plan against. In conclusion, the attribution results can be translated into a four-tier protocol that matches an intervention to each learner’s risk factors, so a fixed outreach budget reaches failing engagement months before withdrawal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: