Machine learning study demonstrates enhanced wildfire burned area detection in California, indicating improved disaster response capabilities through multi-satellite fusion.
The increasing frequency of wildfires under a changing climate has led to extensive ecosystem destruction, highlighting the need for reliable burned area assessment using satellite imagery. Single-satellite data are constrained by observation gaps and interference from smoke and clouds, whereas multi-satellite data fusion can mitigate these limitations. Nonetheless, the fusion techniques still encounter challenges such as spatial information loss from resolution differences and cross-satellite domain mismatch. This study presents a burned area mapping framework that integrates super-resolution (SR) with transfer learning to address spatial and domain gaps in multi-satellite data. Specifically, Landsat-8 imagery is super-resolved to 7.5 m resolution, and the pretrained model is subsequently fine-tuned using Sentinel-2 imagery. Additionally, we investigated spectral index expansion to improve detection performance. Applied to California wildfires from 2013 to 2023, the input band expansion achieved a Burned Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.821 when multiple spectral indices were incorporated. The SR-based transfer learning approach further improved performance with a Burned IoU of 0.850, representing a 4.55 % enhancement over the original Landsat-8 pre-trained model (0.813). Validation on 2025 wildfires demonstrated consistent performance and model robustness. These results highlight that the proposed SR-based approach offers benefits beyond simple resolution enhancement in multi-satellite data fusion. Furthermore, they confirm that spectral index-based input expansion contributes to accuracy improvements. The proposed framework is expected to support disaster response and environmental monitoring applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: