Numerical optimization study demonstrates reduced total pressure loss across transonic and subsonic regimes using CAD-based adjoint profiling, highlighting robust turbine performance.
Modern turbomachinery is required to maintain high aerodynamic performance over a wide operating range. To address this requirement, a multipoint discrete-adjoint optimization framework is developed based on the open-source SU2 platform and blade-profile parameterization based on computer-aided design (CAD). Two representative operating points, corresponding to transonic and subsonic flow conditions, are considered in the multipoint optimization, while two corresponding single-point optimizations are also performed for comparison. The results show that the multipoint optimized blade achieves a 17.3% reduction in weighted total pressure loss relative to the baseline blade, with reductions of 20.4% and 12.0% at the two operating points, respectively. Although the single-point optimized designs show better performance at their respective design points, the subsonic single-point optimized blade suffers suction-side trailing-edge separation under the transonic condition, leading to an enlarged vortex region, intensified wake mixing, and degraded aerodynamic performance. Geometrically, the optimized blades exhibit a reduced geometric chord length through a decrease in stagger angle under the fixed axial-chord constraint, and the multipoint optimized profile lies between the transonic and subsonic single-point design tendencies near the suction-side leading edge. The corresponding flow-field changes include an upstream shift of the high-Mach-number region, smoother postpeak deceleration, weakened shock intensity, and reduced flow loss. In addition, the multipoint optimized blade shows lower turbulent kinetic energy levels near the trailing edge, increased trailing-edge base pressure, and reduced wake-vortex size, indicating weakened wake mixing and lower local energy dissipation. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for multipoint aerodynamic optimization of turbine cascades.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: