Key result
Antiarrhythmic drugs serve primarily as safety-driven, adjunctive therapy to device and interventional strategies in cardiomyopathies.
Why the study?
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary across phenotypes, and specific recommendations remain fragmented.
Systematic Review (n=11)
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies should be individualized and phenotype-driven, prioritizing safety with beta-blockers and amiodarone as adjunctive treatments to device therapy for reducing arrhythmic burden.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Limits AADs to safety-driven adjunctive roles in cardiomyopathies; confirms guideline consensus while highlighting evidence gaps for non-HCM phenotypes.
Purpose of Review Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary substantially across phenotypes. This review summarizes contemporary guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use in hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Recent Findings Recent guidelines increasingly emphasize phenotype-oriented arrhythmia management, but specific recommendations for antiarrhythmic drug therapy remain fragmented. Beta-blockers and amiodarone are the most consistently recommended agents in structural heart disease, whereas class I drugs are generally restricted. Evidence is strongest for hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, while recommendations for dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathies are largely extrapolated from broader heart failure populations. Summary Antiarrhythmic drugs are mainly used to reduce arrhythmic burden, symptoms, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies rather than to improve survival. Future studies should define phenotype-specific strategies based on ventricular function, myocardial scar, genotype, and clinical context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palermi et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiomyopathies (n=11). Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was evaluated on Guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies is primarily safety-driven, only partly phenotype-specific, and mostly adjunctive to device-based and interventional strategies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: