Spatial modeling study demonstrates topography-dependent soil organic carbon vulnerability under warming in temperate mountain forests, suggesting targeted landscape-level carbon conservation.
Soil organic carbon (SOC) in mountain forest ecosystems exerts critical controls over regional carbon balance and climate feedback loops. This study collected 209 stratified topsoil (0–30 cm) samples across temperate mountain forests of Northeast China, conducted a boosted regression tree (BRT) modeling framework integrated with space-for-time substitution, and established 15 combined thermopluviometric sensitivity scenarios to simulate SOC shifts under diversified climate disturbances. Tenfold cross-validation yielded a model mean R2 of 0.62, revealing mean annual temperature (MAT, RI = 35.31%) as the most influential predictor of SOC spatial variation, followed by elevation (ELE, RI = 19.11%), while single-season NDVI and soil particle fractions showed weak predictive capacity. Multi-scenario spatial simulation outputs demonstrated that simultaneous warming and aridification drastically reduce the coverage of high SOC zones, whereas increased precipitation can partially offset temperature-induced carbon mineralization losses. Terrain-mediated SOC spatial stratification remained stable across all climate backgrounds. This study quantifies the layered environmental association hierarchy of mountain SOC and generates spatially explicit modeled carbon sink projections under climate change. The terrain-dependent SOC response patterns provide operable differentiated carbon regulation guidance: humid low-lying convergence zones require long-term soil moisture conservation, while arid steep ridges need native mixed forest restoration to lift baseline carbon storage capacity, supporting precise watershed climate adaptation and targeted forest carbon sink management for temperate mountain regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: