Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What happens to the Melanesian Way as a shared identity across scale, from people to nation and sub-region? I explore ideas of ‘Melanesian-ness’, drawing on the early ideas of Kanak independence leader Jean-Marie Tjibaou, Bernard Narokobi’s 1980 conceptualization of ‘the Melanesian Way’, and institutional interpretations by the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG). I examine MSG-led Melanesian arts and cultural festivals (MACFESTs) as state-curated spaces celebrating Melanesian identity and self-representation, reflecting on the 2023 MACFEST held in Vanuatu. I argue that contemporary official ‘bounded’ Melanesian identity has political utility but retains a strategic flexibility by maintaining an ‘unbounded, open’ Melanesianism, as characterized by Narokobi and Tjibaou. Recognition of cultural promotion as an expression of sub-regional identity, autonomy, and statecraft aids an understanding of the role MACFESTs play within MSG politics, and the embodiment of the Melanesian Way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Naupa (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: