Simulation study reveals cost-neutral emission cuts of up to 7.2% in an industrial refinery multi-energy system, highlighting the value of asset operational flexibility.
Industrial refineries operate as complex multi-energy systems where electricity, process fuels, steam, and multiple energy carriers interact across tightly coupled processes. This work presents a data-driven optimisation framework implemented in PyPSA to analyse operational dispatch and evaluate alternative decarbonisation technologies in a refinery energy system. The model integrates detailed historical operational data and hourly efficiency profiles to replicate assets’ behaviour and explore different technology configurations over a reference year. The objective function includes annualised capital expenditures and operating costs, including maintenance and energy carrier costs, enabling a consistent comparison of candidate technologies within the operational optimisation. The analysis provides insights into the potential contributions of existing assets’ flexibility and sector coupling to the identification of cost-efficient refinery decarbonisation strategies. Key performance indicators include total system cost, technology utilisation factors, and the resulting configuration of the energy system. The proposed full-year, hourly resolved LP approach offers a data-driven tool for exploring operational improvements and evaluating technology options under realistic operating conditions in industrial energy systems. The identified cost-optimal solutions for the multi-energy sub-system object of the study achieve annual emissions reductions of up to 7.2% of around 600 ktonCO2eq/y while maintaining annual system costs comparable to those of the reference case. Across all scenarios, flexible scheduling of the existing generation assets consistently emerges as a key driver of operational savings, highlighting the potential of industrial multi-energy systems to provide market-responsive demand-side flexibility through the adaptation of energy dispatch in response to electricity market signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghionda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: