Validation study demonstrates semantic preservation across structured data transformations, suggesting viable producer-neutral evidence verification.
Transformation-Stable Evidence Interoperability (TSEI) is a producer-neutral mechanism for deciding whether a declared transformation preserves the semantic surfaces that a domain profile marks as protected. It does so by recomputing source and target evaluations rather than trusting either artifact's self-report. The specification defines a five-outcome verdict model; edgewise cycle evaluation that prevents later endpoint restoration from erasing an intermediate failure; closed-world coverage over the structural paths observed in one evaluated pair; deterministic selector precedence; an explicit normalizer-authority trust root; and canonical comparator requirements. This publication has three distinct evidence layers. First, Sections 1-16 state the generic normative mechanism. Second, an extraction boundary is mechanically exercised on a synthetic non-domain object, with runtime import closure excluding ReceiptOS and Chronicle domain terms; the current repository location is therefore a packaging fact, not a dependency of the generic core. Third, a separately governed Protocol v2 case study records one post-ratification independently grounded instance. In that instance, a prior collaborator acting as Authority derived attribution sets from answer-free Object A before oracle disclosure; the originator's commitment was opened from the exact E0 artifact at rest; and the independently frozen Object B agreed with the revealed oracle over the complete 12-case universe. The case study establishes bounded artifact grounding for one instance. It does not independently machine-verify the human semantic judgment, does not establish a complete real-run claim, and does not provide cross-authority replication. The Authority relationship is disclosed as EXTERNAL_PRIOR_PROTOCOL_EXPOSURE: operational information separation was enforced, but organizational or stranger independence is not claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavlo Tvardovskyi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: