Simulation study demonstrates aerodynamic agreement with experimental data across high-lift aircraft models, indicating wall-modeled large-eddy simulation scales effectively with massive grids.
This paper presents solution assessments and grid-convergence studies for the test cases outlined in the Fifth High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-5), focusing on the high-lift Common Research Models (CRM-HL). The study utilizes a wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) methodology developed in the unstructured-grid, node-centered flow solver FUN3D. The second-order-accurate simulations conducted in this study employ a finite-volume spatial discretization and an implicit temporal scheme. Large-scale turbulent features are resolved away from the wall, with small-scale effects captured by the Vreman subgrid-scale model. An equilibrium wall function uses the first grid point off the wall, which serves as the critical interface between the wall model and the large-eddy simulation region, thus requiring careful placement in grid design. Grid-convergence studies are systematically conducted using a global uniform refinement approach, with mesh sizes ranging from several hundred million to 20 billion grid points at the finest resolution level for full high-lift landing configurations. WMLES solutions are assessed for HLPW-5 cases, including a clean wing–body configuration and geometry-buildup configurations corresponding to the ONERA 5.1% CRM-HL model. Moreover, simulation results and grid sensitivity are presented for the NASA 5.2% CRM-HL configuration at both moderate and flight-scale Reynolds numbers. Overall, the WMLES results are satisfactory and agree well with the available experimental data, especially on sufficiently fine grids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: