Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Relaxations of strips of rat gastric fundus were elicited with nicotine (100 mumol/L), nitric oxide (NO; 30 mumol/L), sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 100 nmol/L) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP; 1 nmol/L). 2. Methylene blue (30 mumol/L), an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, reduced relaxations elicited by NO and nicotine, but not those elicited by VIP. 3. Chymotrypsin (1 U/mL) abolished VIP-induced relaxations and reduced nicotine-induced relaxations, but had no effect on SNP-induced relaxations. 4. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 100 mumol/L), an inhibitor of NO synthase, reduced relaxations elicited by nicotine, but not those elicited by SNP or VIP. 5. When nicotine-induced relaxations had been reduced by either L-NAME or chymotrypsin, the addition of the other agent produced a greater reduction. However, the relaxations were not abolished. 6. Nicotine-induced relaxations were abolished by tetrodotoxin (1 mumol/L) or hexamethonium (100 mumol/L), indicating that they were due to activation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Their reduction by methylene blue and L-NAME indicates that an NO-like mediator was involved. Their reduction by chymotrypsin indicates that a VIP-like peptide was involved. However, since they were not abolished by a combination of L-NAME and chymotrypsin, it appears that at least one more as yet unidentified mediator may be involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mclaren et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: