Phylogenetic modeling reveals a methanogenic root near Euryarchaeota in Archaea, suggesting early ancestors were complex free-living microbes rather than host-dependent organisms.
The phylogeny of the Archaea continues to be revisited and revised as new groups are discovered and phylogenetic methods improve, but key questions about their early evolution remain unanswered. It has been suggested that the root of the Archaea may lie on, or potentially within, any of three major groups - the Euryarchaeota, TACK+Asgard clade, and DPANN, the last of which includes many host-associated and genome-reduced lineages. These root hypotheses make starkly different predictions about the nature of early archaeal evolution: for example, a root on or within DPANN might suggest a small-genome and host-associated ancestor, with methanogenesis, the hall- mark metabolism of the Archaea, evolving later. Here, we investigate the position of the archaeal root and the nature of the last archaeal common ancestor using a range of phylogenetic approaches, including the best avail- able site- and branch-heterogeneous substitution models, and new gene tree- species tree reconciliation models that capture changes in rates of gene duplication, loss and transfer across the phylogeny. Our analyses converge on a narrow archaeal root region at or near the base of the Euryarchaeota, sup- porting hypotheses in which the Last Archaeal Common Ancestor (LACA) was a complex, free-living (hyper-)thermophilic methanogen. We recover DPANN as the sister group to TACK and Asgard archaea, and suggest that their genome evolution has been characterised by episodes of genome streamlining and expansion, driven by gene loss and transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: