Key result
Higher TAND linked to ~31% greater odds of non-inducible AVNRT per 50-ms increase.
Why the study?
To examine whether a simple electrophysiological descriptor derived from routinely measured antegrade atrioventricular nodal conduction parameters is associated with non-inducible AVNRT.
Does the Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) index predict non-inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in patients undergoing electrophysiological study for suspected AVNRT?
Cohort (n=387)
Does the Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) index predict non-inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in patients undergoing electrophysiological study for suspected AVNRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) index is modestly associated with non-inducible AVNRT, reflecting slower antegrade nodal conduction, but is not suitable as an individual-level prediction tool.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a simple electrophysiological descriptor derived from routinely measured antegrade atrioventricular nodal conduction parameters is associated with non-inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 387 consecutive patients undergoing electrophysiological study for clinically suspected AVNRT. The Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) index was defined as the sum of the atrio-His (AH) interval and antegrade Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL). Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and quadrant-based continuum analysis were performed. Because WBCL values were missing predominantly in inducible patients, complete-case and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Non-inducible AVNRT occurred in 106 patients (27.4%). In the complete-case TAND cohort (n = 329), higher TAND values were associated with non-inducibility (odds ratio [OR] per 50-ms increase: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, P = .032), remaining significant after adjustment for age and sex (adjusted OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.63, P = .016). Discrimination was modest (area under the curve: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.525-0.659). After multiple imputation, the association remained directionally consistent but was attenuated (adjusted OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.99-1.46, P = .056). Quadrant analysis demonstrated a graded increase in non-inducibility from the low-AH/low-WBCL to the high-AH/high-WBCL quadrant (25.0% vs. 42.3%; trend OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.61, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Total Antegrade Nodal Delay was modestly associated with non-inducible AVNRT and may describe a group-level electrophysiological pattern characterized by slower antegrade nodal conduction and higher functional conduction thresholds. However, TAND should not be interpreted as a mechanistic requirement for AVNRT inducibility or as an individual-level prediction tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çelik et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Clinically suspected atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=387). Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) index vs. Lower TAND values was evaluated on Non-inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.63, p=.016). Higher Total Antegrade Nodal Delay (TAND) values were associated with non-inducible AVNRT (adjusted OR per 50-ms increase 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63; P=0.016).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: