Preclinical study reveals that gut microbial fucosidase liberates L-fucose from fungal polysaccharides to enhance anti-PD-1 therapy in tumor-bearing mice, highlighting microbiome-dietary adjuvants.
Immune checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 (αPD1) antibodies has transformed cancer therapy, yet most patients remain non-responsive. Safe and effective adjuvants that overcome resistance are urgently needed. Traditional Chinese medicine polysaccharides exhibit immunomodulatory potential, but their mechanisms in enhancing immunotherapy remain poorly defined. By screening polysaccharide-enriched extracts from six traditional medicines, we identified Wolfiporia cocos polysaccharide (WCP) as a potent enhancer of αPD1 efficacy across multiple subcutaneous tumor models without inducing overt systemic toxicity. The activity of WCP was microbiota-dependent and was associated with increased Turicibacter abundance in the WCP + αPD1 treatment context. Functional validation showed that T. sanguinis FUC2-associated α-L-fucosidase activity could liberate L-fucose from WCP. Serum metabolomics, targeted L-fucose quantification, microbial add-back, and engineered bacterial experiments supported a contributory role for fucosidase-mediated L-fucose release in the therapeutic benefit of WCP. Supplementation with T. sanguinis or engineered E. coli expressing FUC2 partially rescued the WCP-enhanced αPD1 response under microbiota-depleted conditions. Both WCP and L-fucose increased intratumoral IFNγ⁺CD8⁺ T-cell accumulation, and CD8⁺ T-cell depletion abolished the antitumor effect. Notably, WCP further enhanced αPD1 efficacy in mice colonized with fecal microbiota from non-responding cancer patients. These findings identify a gut microbial fucosidase-associated pathway that contributes to WCP-derived L-fucose release and supports enhanced αPD1 immunotherapy. This work provides a mechanistic rationale for integrating structurally defined dietary polysaccharides with immune checkpoint blockade to improve therapeutic responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: