Animal study reveals that combined policosanol and atorvastatin reduces dyslipidemia and tissue damage in zebrafish, highlighting synergistic metabolic and organ protection.
The study compares the effects of policosanol (Poli), atorvastatin (Ator), and their combination (Poli+Ator) in mitigating high-cholesterol and high-galactose (HCHG) diet-induced metabolic stress and organ damage in zebrafish. After 22 weeks of feeding, the lowest survival probability was observed in the Ator-supplemented group (0.64). In comparison, the Poli and Poli+Ator-supplemented groups showed higher survival probabilities of 0.76 and 0.71, respectively. Compared with Poli, Ator supplementation had a greater effect in mitigating HCHG-induced dyslipidemia. Nonetheless, Poli+Ator demonstrated a significantly greater effect than Ator and Poli in reducing total blood cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and in elevating the HDL-C/TC ratio. No significant effect of Ator supplementation was observed on the HCHG-induced elevations in blood glucose and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels or the diminished sulfhydryl content; however, Poli alone and Poli+Ator significantly improved blood glucose, MDA, and sulfhydryl content. Consistently, the non-significant effect of Ator on the amputated tail fin regeneration was substantially improved by the Poli+Ator supplementation. In addition, Poli and Poli+Ator markedly reduce liver steatosis, neutrophil infiltration, and interleukin (IL)-6 production, while inhibiting the generation of oxidative species and senescent-positive cells in the kidney and preventing intestinal fibrosis. Also, Poli and Poli+Ator substantially minimize HCHG-triggered oxidative stress in reproductive organs, enhance spermatozoa count in the testis and substantially improve the embryo-producing ability of zebrafish. The study outlines the beneficial effect of Poli and Poli+Ator in mitigating HCHG-induced dyslipidemia, organ damage, and reproductive health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: