Qualitative study reveals strategic situational use of panethnic labels among gender-expansive Latin Americans, highlighting protective identity management across social settings.
The present study draws from interviews with 54 U.S.-born gender-expansive people of Latin American descent to examine how they understand, identify with, and use ‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’ relative to ‘Hispanic’ and ‘Latino/a’. We find many not only identified with ‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’ among labels like ‘Hispanic’ and ‘Latino/a’, they also described ‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’ to feel the most authentic. Participants also reported the political and policy climate in the U.S. around gender-expansive individuals contributed to deepened investment in ‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’ identity. Moreover, rather than seeing ‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’ as fully interchangeable with ‘Hispanic’ and ‘Latino/a’, participants explained the ability of the former to communicate unique social information about their users. This information ranged from political stances and cultural values to queer identity. Last, we report a discrepancy found between the labels many identified most with (‘Latinx’ and ‘Latine’) and the labels participants cited using most often across social interactions (‘Hispanic’ and ‘Latino/a’). We analyze this discrepancy as strategic decisions mediated by various contextual concerns across family, friends, work, and online settings. These concerns included discrimination, stigmatization, and preservation from emotional and mental labor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tenorio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: