Practice protocol demonstrates a transparent workflow for AI-assisted writing in independent scholars, highlighting the necessity of human accountability.
This practical protocol provides independent scholars and creative professionals with a transparent workflow for responsible AI-assisted authorship and manuscript submission. It covers human accountability, AI-use disclosure, fact and citation verification, duplicate-submission checks, authorship, conflicts of interest, privacy, licensing, repository deposit, and recordkeeping. AI may support drafting and organization, but it does not replace human judgment, verification, or responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Neely (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: