What does this research mean for the field?

User interaction with GPS-enabled map applications is significantly shaped by both individual traits and urban form, where spatial anxiety reduces interaction frequency and regularity, and complex urban layouts exacerbate irregular interactions for highly anxious users. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.CONFIRMATORY. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.SUPPORTS_CONSENSUS.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To determine how individual spatial traits and urban street network morphology influence real-world touch interaction patterns on GPS-enabled mobile map applications.

August 29, 2026ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and SystemsOpen Access

How Sense of Direction, Spatial Anxiety, and Urban Form Shape Interaction with GPS-enabled Map Applications

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DZDonatella Zingaro TRTumasch Reichenbacher SFSara Irina Fabrikant

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Observational study reveals that spatial anxiety and complex urban form reduce active GPS map interaction in smartphone users, suggesting opportunities for adaptive navigation interfaces.

Key Points

To determine how individual spatial traits and urban street network morphology influence real-world touch interaction patterns on GPS-enabled mobile map applications.
Tracked smartphone touchscreen interactions during natural map use, measuring tap frequency (tap rate) and regularity (inter-tap interval variability, CV–ITI).
Calculated graph-based street network metrics, including orientation entropy, degree centrality, and closeness centrality.
Assessed individual cognitive traits using self-reported measures of spatial anxiety, sense of direction (SBSOD), and gender.
Spatial anxiety consistently reduced both the frequency and regularity of user touchscreen engagement with navigation applications.
Higher orientation entropy and degree centrality predicted lower tap rates, whereas higher closeness centrality was associated with more regular interaction patterns.
Users with elevated spatial anxiety exhibited more irregular interactions in complex, winding layouts, whereas individuals with strong direction sense maintained regular interactions in well-connected networks.

Cite This Study

Zingaro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9299db8e5d7d1fc0c12166 https://doi.org/10.1145/3844502

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

August 29, 2026ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and SystemsOpen Access

How Sense of Direction, Spatial Anxiety, and Urban Form Shape Interaction with GPS-enabled Map Applications

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DZDonatella Zingaro TRTumasch Reichenbacher SFSara Irina Fabrikant

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Observational study reveals that spatial anxiety and complex urban form reduce active GPS map interaction in smartphone users, suggesting opportunities for adaptive navigation interfaces.

Key Points

To determine how individual spatial traits and urban street network morphology influence real-world touch interaction patterns on GPS-enabled mobile map applications.
Tracked smartphone touchscreen interactions during natural map use, measuring tap frequency (tap rate) and regularity (inter-tap interval variability, CV–ITI).
Calculated graph-based street network metrics, including orientation entropy, degree centrality, and closeness centrality.
Assessed individual cognitive traits using self-reported measures of spatial anxiety, sense of direction (SBSOD), and gender.
Spatial anxiety consistently reduced both the frequency and regularity of user touchscreen engagement with navigation applications.
Higher orientation entropy and degree centrality predicted lower tap rates, whereas higher closeness centrality was associated with more regular interaction patterns.
Users with elevated spatial anxiety exhibited more irregular interactions in complex, winding layouts, whereas individuals with strong direction sense maintained regular interactions in well-connected networks.

Cite This Study

Zingaro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9299db8e5d7d1fc0c12166 https://doi.org/10.1145/3844502

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark