Why the study?
How does ventricular hypertrophy affect transmural conduction velocity in patients with RBBB?
How does ventricular hypertrophy affect transmural conduction velocity in patients with RBBB?
In patients with RBBB, left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with faster transmural conduction velocity, which may explain why left ventricular activation duration is not significantly prolonged in these patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVH associated with faster transmural conduction in RBBB; hypothesis-generating for preserved activation duration, needs prospective validation.
To investigate the effect of ventricular hypertrophy on the conduction velocity, the transmural conduction velocity was obtained from the findings of echocardiographic, and body surface potential mapping examinations on 20 RBBB patients. The transmural conduction velocity was linearly correlated with the ventricular septal thickness and the greater the thickness, the faster was the conduction velocity. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of the left ventricular activation obtained from the mapping examinations as well as in the time of onset of intrinsicoid deflection in V5 between the group of left ventricular hypertrophy and that of non-hypertrophy. There was a good linear correlation between the imaginary distance covered by the activation front which proceeded in the direction from endocardium to epicardium during the left ventricular activation and the ventricular septal thickness. These findings were explicable from the faster conduction velocity in the hypertrophied ventricle. The increase in the conduction velocity in the hypertrophy group would be due to cable characteristics of hypertrophied cardiac cells and also due to increase in the number of multiple intercalated discs in the hypertrophied ventricle. It was concluded that the conduction velocity would be an important information to interpret the ECGs in ventricular hypertrophy as well as to estimate the pathological state of the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toyoshima et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: