Key result
Selective neck dissections during carotid body tumor surgeries identified lymph node malignancy in 14.3% of patients, which was significantly associated with carotid artery injury (OR 34.00).
Why the study?
Carotid body tumors occasionally exhibit malignancy, requiring metastases to non-neuroendocrine tissue for definitive diagnosis, but the role of selective neck dissections in detecting malignancy and guiding management remains uncertain.
Does selective neck dissection during carotid body tumor surgery improve the detection of malignancy?
Observational (n=21)
No
Does selective neck dissection during carotid body tumor surgery improve the detection of malignancy?
Odds Ratio: 34 (95% CI 1.48–781.83)
p-value: p=0.041
Selective neck dissections during carotid body tumor resections can detect malignancy in a non-negligible proportion of patients (14.3%), suggesting a rationale for its universal implementation.
May support selective neck dissection for occult malignancy in carotid body tumor surgery; leaves open safety and efficacy in prospective studies.
Objective Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare neoplasms of the paraganglia at the carotid bifurcation. While typically benign, CBTs occasionally exhibit malignancy, metastasizing to nearby lymph nodes. Histopathologic analysis alone is insufficient to confirm malignancy, requiring metastases to non‐neuroendocrine tissue for a definitive diagnosis. The role of selective neck dissections (SNDs) in detecting malignancy and guiding subsequent management remains uncertain. Method A retrospective case series through electronic chart review was performed on 21 patients undergoing CBT surgeries between 2002 and 2022 at a Canadian institution. SNDs were performed on all 21 patients. Data collection included patient demographics, genetic and laboratory testing results, preoperative imaging, intraoperative and postoperative complications, histologic analysis of neck SND and tumor specimen, and follow‐up results. Results Of the 21 surgical resections, there were three cases (14.3%) of carotid artery injuries and six cases (28.6%) of nerve injuries. One patient (4.8%) experienced three intraoperative strokes. Three patients (14.3%) were found to have lymph node involvement, confirming malignancy, and underwent further treatment with radiotherapy. Interestingly, two patients with carotid injuries had malignant tumors, demonstrating a statistical significance between carotid injury and malignancy (OR 34.00, 95% CI: 1.48, 781.83, p = .041). Conclusion SNDs are a useful adjunct in detecting malignancy during CBT surgeries. The incidence of malignancy in CBT is low but not negligible, and SND should be considered in patients to prevent inadvertent underdetection of metastatic disease. This study's 14.3% incidence of malignancy suggests that there may be a rationale for considering the universal implementation of SND during CBT resections. Level of Evidence 4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francis et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Carotid body tumors (n=21). Selective neck dissections (SNDs) was evaluated on Malignancy (lymph node involvement) and its association with carotid artery injury (OR 34.00, 95% CI 1.48-781.83, p=0.041). Selective neck dissections during carotid body tumor surgeries identified lymph node malignancy in 14.3% of patients, which was significantly associated with carotid artery injury (OR 34.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: