Key result
MUNIX and needle EMG both identified neurogenic abnormalities in subjects with remote polio, but there was no correlation between the results of the two methods.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the utility of MUNIX with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit properties in the biceps brachii muscle in subjects with remote polio.
Does MUNIX correlate with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit properties in subjects with remote polio?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Does MUNIX correlate with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit properties in subjects with remote polio?
MUNIX and needle EMG provide complementary information on the denervation and reinnervation process in remote polio, as their results do not correlate.
Supports complementary MUNIX and needle EMG use in remote polio; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objective: To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio. Methods: Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG. Results: Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations. Conclusions: Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods. Significance: The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreas Sandberg (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in remote polio (n=30). MUNIX (motor unit number index) vs. needle EMG was evaluated on Correlation between MUNIX and needle EMG results. MUNIX and needle EMG both identified neurogenic abnormalities in subjects with remote polio, but there was no correlation between the results of the two methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: