Key result
A very low volume eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program increased maximal eccentric strength and showed a nonsignificant reduction in hamstring injuries (22% vs 39%; P=0.12).
Why the study?
To determine whether a very low volume of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program of 21 weeks increases maximal eccentric strength, how compliance affects it, and if it reduces hamstring injury rate.
Does a very low volume of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program increase maximal eccentric strength and reduce hamstring injury rate in professional soccer players?
Cohort (n=46)
Does a very low volume of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program increase maximal eccentric strength and reduce hamstring injury rate in professional soccer players?
Effect estimate: 2.7-fold lower risk
Absolute Event Rate: 22% vs 39%
p-value: p=.12
A very low volume Nordic hamstring exercise program increases maximal eccentric strength in professional soccer players, with magnitude dependent on compliance, but does not significantly reduce injury rates.
Increases eccentric strength in soccer players without confirmed injury reduction; leaves open efficacy of very low-volume Nordic programs.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the inclusion of a very low volume (1 set of 3 maximal repetitions) of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program of 21 weeks induced an increase in maximal eccentric strength and whether its magnitude was influenced by the compliance rate. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether this eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program was effective at reducing hamstring injury rate. Twenty-three professional soccer players formed the experimental group and undertook regular in-season hamstring strength training and monitoring for 21 weeks. Data from 23 players in the immediately preceding cohort (previous year) were included as a control group. The subdivision of the experimental group revealed that the high compliance subgroup (∼13 d between sessions) exhibited higher changes in maximal eccentric strength compared with the low compliance group (∼24 d between sessions; +26.5%; 95% confidence interval, 7.1%-45.9%; P < .001; g = 1.2). Five hamstring injuries (22%) were recorded in the experimental group and 9 (39%) in the control group, corresponding to a nonsignificant 2.7-fold lower risk (P = .12) of suffering hamstring injury in the experimental group. The current study demonstrates that the inclusion of a very low volume of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program for 21 weeks induced an increase in maximal eccentric strength (∼15%) in professional soccer players, the magnitude of which depended on the players' compliance. We also found that this program was efficient (2.7-fold lower risk), although nonsignificant, at reducing hamstring injury rate in professional soccer players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cadu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Professional soccer players (n=46). Very low volume eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program vs. Immediately preceding cohort (regular training) was evaluated on Hamstring injury rate (2.7-fold lower risk, p=.12). A very low volume eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program increased maximal eccentric strength and showed a nonsignificant reduction in hamstring injuries (22% vs 39%; P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: