Key result
Monoclonal antibodies against FMD vaccine strains successfully differentiated field isolates, offering advantages over traditional r1 and VN ratios for assessing immunological coverage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Panels of appropriately selected MAbs are useful for FMD-control programs to guide immunological coverage of vaccines against circulating field strains.
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were produced against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus types O1 Campos Br1/58, A24 Cruzeiro Br1/55, and C3 Indaial Br1/71, which are the strains used for production of FMD vaccines in the majority of South American countries. Within the library of MAbs produced, a group was selected on the basis of their neutralizing titer in cell culture, protective titer in suckling mice, sensitivity to trypsin, and specificity for virus structural proteins. The MAbs were utilized in an ELISA test format to compare European and South American representative field isolates with vaccine production strains in their r1 relationship as obtained by 50% complement fixation (CF50) with polyclonal antibodies (PAb) and their virus neutralization (VN) relationship obtained with sera from one-time-vaccinated and from revaccinated cattle, respectively. The MAbs selected varied in their reactivity against the different strains and, therefore, enabled us to compare field FMDV strains to those against which the MAbs were produced, with definite advantages over the r1 and VN ratios. Thus, panels of MAb produced with the vaccine strains and appropriately selected are significantly useful for the FMD-control programs because they serve to provide guidance on the immunological coverage provided by the vaccines against FMDV strains circulating in the field. The MAbs are also useful for the differentiation of FMD virus strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alonso et al. (1993) studied Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against FMD virus types vs. Polyclonal antibodies (PAb) and sera from vaccinated cattle was evaluated on Reactivity against different FMDV strains. Monoclonal antibodies against FMD vaccine strains successfully differentiated field isolates, offering advantages over traditional r1 and VN ratios for assessing immunological coverage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: