Why the study?
Is pharmacologic stress imaging using dipyridamole effective for the detection of coronary artery disease and risk stratification in patients unable to exercise?
Is pharmacologic stress imaging using dipyridamole effective for the detection of coronary artery disease and risk stratification in patients unable to exercise?
Pharmacologic stress imaging with dipyridamole is a highly sensitive and specific alternative to exercise testing for detecting coronary artery disease and risk stratification in patients unable to exercise.
May support dipyridamole-thallium imaging when exercise is infeasible; leaves open need for contemporary validation.
Pharmacologic stress imaging has increasingly been employed as an alternative to exercise imaging for detection of coronary artery disease and risk stratification particularly in patients who are unable to perform adequate exercise. Sensitivity and specificity of thallium 201 scintigraphy using intravenous dipyridamole infusion as a stress for coronary artery disease detection average 85% and 91%, respectively. Dipyridamole imaging is also useful for differentiating between ischemia and scar and identifying patients who have an increased risk for subsequent cardiac events. Dipyridamole imaging is particularly useful for preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing surgery for peripheral vascular or aortic disease. Dipyridamole imaging is also useful for identifying residual myocardial ischemia after myocardial infarction and detecting restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Adverse side effects of dipyridamole are promptly reversed by aminophylline. Dipyridamole stress can also be employed in association with echocardiography for detection of ischemia-induced regional wall motion abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George Beller (1991) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Pharmacologic stress imaging (intravenous dipyridamole) vs. Exercise imaging was evaluated on Detection of coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: