Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3-D printing allows for rapid prototyping and manufacture of components in a cost effective and timely manner, becoming a popular technology for oceanographic and maritime engineering applications. However, 3-D printed components are at risk of accumulating marine biofouling. This study examined the antifouling (AF) performance of three Cu-containing 3-D printing polymer filaments for potential marine use. The amount of Cu present in each filament was the primary determinant of AF performance. The lowest Cu-content (30%) filament recording 29% biofouling cover after 1 month and near 100% cover after 3 months. These AF results were comparable to polylactide acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer filament controls. The medium (50%) Cu-content filament remained largely free of biofouling until 3 months (where 48% coverage was observed), after which fouling cover increased to 100% by ∼12 months. The highest Cu-content (80%) filament remained free of all macrofouling for the entire 24 months of the experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piola et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: