The circumstances under which EDX microanalysis can yield serious errors as a function of the crystallographic orientation are discussed. It is shown that such errors can be as high as 50° when examining a fully ordered alloy or compound. Experimental results obtained on CuPt are correlated with a theoretical treatment demonstrating both the necessity in such calculations of considering Bloch wave summation effects and that the small value of the impact parameter thus inferred is consistent with a simple time-dependent perturbation treatment of the inelastic scattering process. The reasons why localization effects should be less apparent in energy loss than in EDX measurements are also considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourdillon et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: