Key result
BPIP administered at 75 mg/kg daily reduced peak virus titres by ~1000-fold (P=0.00005) and significantly lowered viral genome load in blood (P<=0.001) compared to untreated pigs.
Why the study?
Does BPIP reduce virus replication in pigs infected with classical swine fever virus?
Does BPIP reduce virus replication in pigs infected with classical swine fever virus?
BPIP provides the first proof of concept for the prophylaxis and treatment of classical swine fever virus infection in pigs by significantly reducing viral replication.
Hypothesis-generating for BPIP in classical swine fever; prospective trials needed before veterinary translation.
5-[(4-Bromophenyl)methyl]-2-phenyl-5H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine (BPIP) is a representative of a class of imidazopyridines with potentin vitroantiviral activity against pestiviruses including classical swine fever virus (CSFV). This study analysed whether the lead compound, BPIP, was able to reduce virus replication in infected piglets. The compound, administered in feed, was readily bioavailable and was well tolerated. Eight specific-pathogen-free pigs received a daily dose of 75 mg kg−1(mixed in feed) for a period of 15 consecutive days, starting 1 day before infection with the CSFV field isolate Wingene. BPIP-treated pigs developed a short, transient viraemia (one animal remained negative) and leukopenia (three animals did not develop leukopenia). Virus titres at peak viraemia (7 days post-infection) were markedly lower (∼1000-fold) than in untreated animals (P=0.00005) and the viral genome load in blood was also significantly lower (P≤0.001) in drug-treated animals than in untreated animals over the entire experiment. At the end of the experiment (day 33), no infectious virus was detectable in the tonsils of BPIP-treated animals, although low levels of viral RNA were detected. The inability to isolate infectious virus from the tonsils indicates that the risk of a persistent CSFV infection is negligible. Further optimization of the antiviral potency and bioavailability of this lead compound may result in molecules completely suppressing virus replication. A potent antiviral could potentially be used as a primary control measure against virus spread in case of an outbreak, in addition to present countermeasures. This study provides the first proof of concept for the prophylaxis/treatment of CSFV infection in pigs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vrancken et al. (2009) studied Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) infection. BPIP vs. Untreated animals was evaluated on Virus titres at peak viraemia (7 days post-infection) (~1000-fold lower, p=0.00005). BPIP administered at 75 mg/kg daily reduced peak virus titres by ~1000-fold (P=0.00005) and significantly lowered viral genome load in blood (P<=0.001) compared to untreated pigs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: