Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown similar efficacy of oral supplementation of cobalamin compared to injectable supplementation in dogs, but few prospective, randomized studies have been published. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy of oral or injectable supplementation with cobalamin in normalizing serum cobalamin and methylmalonic acid (MMA) concentrations in dogs with hypocobalaminemia caused by either chronic enteropathy (CE) or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). ANIMALS: Forty-six client owned dogs with hypocobalaminemia. METHODS: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Dogs were divided into 2 groups (CE or EPI), and randomized to receive oral or injectable supplementation of cobalamin. Each dog had 3 visits and serum cobalamin and MMA concentrations were measured at each visit. RESULTS: In dogs with CE, serum cobalamin concentrations increased with oral (P = .02; median 149 [range 149-231] to 733 [166-1467] ng/L, median difference 552 [95% CI: 181-899] ng/L) or injectable (P < .01; 168 [149-233] to 563 [234-965] ng/L, 367 [187-623] ng/L) supplementation. In dogs with EPI, serum cobalamin concentrations increased with oral (P = .01; 162 [149-214] to 919 [643-3863] ng/L, 705 [503-3356] ng/L) or injectable (P = .01; 177 [149-217] to 390 [243-907] ng/L, 192 [89-361] ng/L) supplementation. Serum MMA concentrations decreased with oral or injectable supplementation in dogs with CE, but only with oral supplementation in dogs with EPI. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Oral supplementation is an alternative for cobalamin supplementation in dogs with hypocobalaminemia caused by CE or EPI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: