Key result
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows no significant increase in second primary malignancy risk vs no chemotherapy.
Why the study?
Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is linked to second primary malignancies and heart failure, but long-term data regarding these risks after pegylated liposomal doxorubicin treatment remain limited.
Does pegylated liposomal doxorubicin reduce the risk of symptomatic heart failure and second primary malignancies compared to conventional anthracyclines in early-stage breast cancer survivors?
Cohort (n=1,372)
No
Does pegylated liposomal doxorubicin reduce the risk of symptomatic heart failure and second primary malignancies compared to conventional anthracyclines in early-stage breast cancer survivors?
Hazard Ratio: 2.25 (95% CI 0.66–7.72)
p-value: p=0.61
In early-stage breast cancer survivors, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin showed comparable survival and no significantly increased risk of symptomatic heart failure or second primary malignancies compared to conventional anthracyclines.
PLD-based chemotherapy showed no significant SPM increase versus no chemotherapy; observational data leave open its HF advantage over conventional anthracyclines.
Background Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is a crucial treatment for early-stage breast cancer but be associated with second primary malignancy (SPM) and heart failure (HF). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has been used as an alternative to conventional non-pegylated anthracyclines; however, long-term data regarding SPM and symptomatic HF after PLD-based treatment remain limited. This study evaluated the long-term risks of SPM and symptomatic HF and compared survival outcomes between PLD-based and conventional anthracycline-based regimens. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1,372 patients with early-stage breast cancer treated at Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Patients were categorized into a reference group without neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, a PLD group, and a conventional anthracycline group (non-PLD) treated with doxorubicin or epirubicin. The risks of SPM and symptomatic HF were analyzed using Cox regression and competing-risk models. Cardinality matching at a 1:4 ratio was used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the PLD and conventional anthracycline groups. Results Overall, the 10-year cumulative incidences of SPM in the reference and non-PLD groups were 9.5% and 9.8%, respectively. The 10-year cumulative incidence of hematologic malignancy after conventional anthracycline exposure was 0.5%. Risk factors for SPM included age ≥ 40 years and stage II disease. Thirty-nine patients developed symptomatic HF, with risk factors including BMI ≥ 24 and stage III disease. After 1:4 cardinality matching, 51 patients in the PLD group and 204 patients in the non-PLD group were matched. No significant differences in DFS or OS were observed between the PLD and non-PLD groups. Conclusions In this single-center cohort of early-stage breast cancer survivors, neither PLD-based nor conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of SPM or symptomatic HF compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy. PLD-based regimens showed comparable survival outcomes to conventional anthracycline-based regimens after cardinality matching analysis. These findings support PLD as a potential alternative anthracycline formulation, particularly for patients with cardiac risk factors; however, the low number of events and the small PLD cohort preclude conclusions of equivalence or definitive cardiac safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Early-stage breast cancer (n=1,372). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) vs. No chemotherapy (reference) or conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy was evaluated on Second primary malignancy (SPM) (SHR 2.25, 95% CI 0.66-7.72, p=0.61). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was not associated with a significantly increased risk of second primary malignancies compared to no chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer survivors (SHR 2.25).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: